Cultural enrichment shock and awe

Cultural enrichment shock and awe

Also published at Gates of Vienna

In the real-time tear-jerking mockumentary which we are being bombarded with these days on Cry-TV and in the Bash-Whitey Media, hundreds of thousands of uninvited illiterate, ungrateful and very hostile illegal immigrants are gate-crashing their way onto the European mainland. It has been described as “a humanitarian catastrophe of epic proportions” by the MSM and the emissaries of impeccable morals, who have bestowed upon themselves the privilege to redefine what is acceptable and what is unacceptable, what words we are allowed to utter, what posts we’re allowed to like on Facebook, which tweets we are allowed to retweet on Twitter, how to express our emotions and when to just shut up and keep quiet.

True, it is a human catastrophe of epic proportions, but not in the way that the humanitarian mini-Goebbels of the West would like to portray it. It’s a humanitarian catastrophe for the indigenous peoples of Europe who have been told repeatedly that they have a moral responsibility to feed, house and accommodate a sea of illegal immigrants, many of whom are directly hostile to them, who most definitely will be unable to look after themselves financially, and who will alter the cultural makeup of the continent until it’s completely unrecognizable.

But this is fine, because this is exactly what the elites in the West want. They see it as a good thing. After all, Multiculturalism is the religion of choice among the morally superior these days. And they get to dictate and pontificate over the whining and racists plebs who are significantly less thrilled about the Third-World tsunami rushing towards them than they are. These members of the elite share the same visions as their co-religionists in the Mohammedan world; the only difference is that while in Islam the practitioners prostrate five times a day, the practitioners of Multiculturalism bend over backwards all day long.

And after a while all this backwards-bending seriously affects their thinking, and they stop seeing the outrageousness of their actions. After wandering around in a multicultural la-la haze for an extended period of time, throwing the doors open wide and inviting people from all corners of the globe to come and take part in the wrecking derby which is the slow and thorough deconstruction of modern day Europe seem like the proper and sensible thing to do. They also believe that slamming and bullying anyone who does not share their views is the apex of human morality.

Rest assured: they do not care that time is running out fast. They do not care that if things do not change dramatically very quickly, the escalating humanitarian catastrophe will most likely morph into civil unrest and full-blown wars with all the nastiness that this entails. Nothing could be further from their minds. All they care about is “our moral obligation”, international conventions, dialogue, harmony, social cohesion and exposing racism and bigotry “for what it is”. Feel-good words are more important than facing reality head-on and exhibiting true leadership. Unfortunately, the silent majority don’t hold them to account, but seem to be quite comfortable with the destruction and misery that the elites are wreaking upon them. It’s a real-life Greek tragedy played out on the political stage on a continent run by madmen.

But what we are seeing today is not a random unavoidable event. It’s a product of a very clever military strategy employed by an emboldened enemy who is high on Western weakness and obsequiousness and hell-bent on conquering our lands and ridding them of anything that they perceive as having corrupt classical liberal ideals. And sadly this is no longer a farfetched pipe dream that will never see the light of day. It is within their reach, and if they succeed they will introduce their religion and philosophy, which is as far removed from liberal ideals as women’s rights are removed from the judicial system in Saudi Arabia. If they succeed, there will not be any opt-out clauses for those who are uncomfortable with a political system that makes the rulers of the Stone Age look like modern-day progressives. It’s all in or out with a bang — or a noose around the neck.

Almost everyone who hasn’t yet gone through the degrading ritual of having to swallow the slow-working euthanasia pill supplied by the elitist heirs to the Western civilization — pills which causes the patient to feel guilt and shame and to despise his own history and culture — see it for what it is: unrelenting demographic warfare. It is even the stated goal of the Islamic State (ISIS), which has promised to inundate Europe with refugees in order to destabilize the continent. Not to mention the Muslim Brotherhood and Al-Qaida, who have written this particular strategy into their master plan for Europe. And also several leaders in the Muslim world who have brazenly and unashamedly boasted about how easy it is going to be to bring the Western world to its knees.

The Germans employed similar tactics during World War Two with their Lebensraum project, but they went about it in a slightly different manner. Unlike the enemy of today, the Germans sent in their military machinery first and then populated the conquered areas after they had been won by force. In contrast, today’s enemies send in their civilian population and their combatants disguised as civilians first, safe in the knowledge that a full victory will follow just as surely as summer is followed by autumn if biology is allowed to run its course. It’s a long-term strategy, generational warfare, if you like. Just as the poor immigrants who arrived on boats from Europe in America in the previous centuries toiled to secure a better future for their offspring, the enemy of today will work hard to establish a fertile environment for a hostile takeover of Europe, and implement a full scale Lebensraum project for their people and a new arena in which to introduce their religious and political ambitions.

There really is no need to delve deeper into the reasons why this travesty has been allowed to take place. The details are well known to anyone who has not undergone the mandatory mental castration which is essential for those who wish to have a career in today’s society. But the effects should be obvious to all, and especially those who have a set of working eyes and a brain that isn’t completely enveloped by the thick mass of multicultural syrup which is being pushed as the truth in today’s uber-humanistic societies.

The reasons why we have reached this epic point of no return are manifold, but mostly they are a result of a relentless political indoctrination campaigns that have permeated every strata of our societies and which have been extraordinarily successful in shaping the minds of the young and gullible — of which there seem to be an overabundance of these days. This process, the equivalent of a nonstop mental gang-rape from cradle to grave, has instilled in the average Western man the notion that he himself is to blame for everything that is wrong with this world, and thus he has a moral responsibility to destroy himself, his own heritage and the future of his offspring, in the name of reconciliation, anti-colonialism, multiculturalism and social cohesion. Those who are unaffected by the propaganda and who speak out are subjected to a more crude form of mental gang-rape, which also involves mocking, bullying, telling untruths and destroying lives, often perpetrated by individuals who lack male genitalia, or, in those cases that they do possess them, have very low levels of testosterone.

They like to brag about the fact that we in the West enjoy freedom of speech, and consequently we are free and live in truly democratic societies, but freedom of speech is a mere illusion if the consequences of using this freedom means that you will lose your job, be completely unsuitable for any potential future employment, lose your house, be hounded by the media, and become the target of violent organizations that won’t hesitate for a second to use force in order to reduce you to silence. That is, of course, if the authorities don’t choose to intervene, by way of prosecuting, bankrupting and shipping troublemakers off to gaol for the heinous crime of telling the truth. It should be obvious to all that employing this same logic, one could also argue that North Korea has freedom of speech; it is just that if you use this freedom there it will be some very unsatisfactory consequences for you.

The unfolding crisis which has picked up steam in the last few months has shown us that the pen is indeed mightier than the sword. It has clearly demonstrated that words and ideas, repeated often enough, with enough fervour, self-righteousness, mockery, intimidation and thinly-veiled threats, can be more potent than the most lethal bullet fired from the most powerful rifle. People these days cower when they are accused of racism, bigotry, hatred, Islamophobia just as much as people a couple of generations ago would cower if they had a gun pointed at their heads. As a matter of fact, the levels of self-preservation these days have reached record lows, to the extent that if someone indeed was to pull a gun at the new, modern, well-groomed Western man, his first inclination would not be to try and run away or overpower his assailant, but rather to try and engage him in a conversation in order to try and understand the underlying root causes that led the poor assailant down the spiralling path of justified victimhood rage.

The enemy we’re facing today has realized that there are two ways to subdue a country and bring it to its knees. One is to overwhelm its armed forces by using superior military might, and the other is to create chaos inside country’s borders by non-military means, which will unleash a chain reaction of responses leading to a crippling of its civilian institutions. It is this last scenario that we are seeing the early stages of today. If you can create anarchy in a foreign country and overwhelm the armed forces and the police, then you have severely weakened that country’s ability to defend its external borders, and thus made it ripe for conquest. It’s a strategy of cultural enrichment shock and awe.

In a way, demographic warfare is synonymous with biological warfare. Even hard-core environmentalists will sometimes refer to the human race as a virus that is slowly destroying our planet by its tendency to multiply at an unprecedented rate, and by devouring all of the Earth’s resources. One could use the same analogy and refer to the “refugees” that keep pouring out on our shores in the same manner. These “refugees” have the same effect on our local ecosystem — namely breeding at an unprecedented rate, devouring a great percentage of our resources and putting the ecosystem out of equilibrium, just as the human race, according to these hard-core environmentalists, are putting the Earth’s ecosystem out of equilibrium.

But maybe we shouldn’t use such an analogy, because the high priests and priestesses of moral justice who decide what is acceptable speech and what isn’t don’t like biology, and they’ll mentally emasculate anyone who dare to use the dreaded word or chooses to elaborate on the consequences of elementary biology. People who spell out the basic facts, as presented in Charles Darwin’s book “The origin of species” are vehemently attacked and given cute little labels such as Nazi, racist, bigot, hater etc. which is often enough to stymie a meaningful debate along those lines. But the proponents of mass immigration are themselves unwittingly relying on biological arguments to justify the rapid descent into the abyss, by referring to the aging population, the declining number of babies being born and the effect that this will have on the population in the long term unless it is replenished from the rich baby fields of the Third World. I suppose facts are a good thing as long as they can be used to prop up self-serving arguments.

The enemies of the West have already won a decisive victory, not a full-fledged one in the conventional sense of the word, but an important ideological victory, in which they have managed to get large groups of the population to sympathizes with them and their cause. It’s like a massive outbreak of battered wife syndrome, in which people have turned a blind eye to the unpleasantness that follow in the wake of mandatory cultural enrichment, and refuse to face the dire realities that lie in wait in the exciting land of the future. The verbal and ideological assault have left us shell-shocked. We are walking around aimlessly scratching our heads trying to figure it all out while bathing in the multicultural euphoria spewed out by the mass media.

If Hitler had possessed the knowledge that our enemies possess today, and if he had chosen to use the same tactics he would probably have had his thousand-year Reich a couple of generations after his death. Today there are thousands of Hitler clones walking around in silly little potato sacks in the Arab and Muslim world who are actively availing themselves of this demographic bomb strategy. These clones reminisce about the good old days of Hitler and they envy his quick and industrial extermination of the Jews. But at the same time they realize that a rapid holocaust “Hitler-style” is probably out of their reach at the present stage, and instead they settle for a slow holocaust, in which the wheel of time slowly grind away at the native populations of the West, and eventually the victims themselves lose hope and give up the will to procreate and the desire to defend themselves.

Strategy is Alpha and Omega in any planned operation. People who don’t have a strategy are just walking around aimlessly in the dark, and will soon be defeated by those who have thought out their moves in advance. The EU’s pathetic non-existent attempts at solving this problem can be viewed as nothing other than an open invitation to the enemy to bring the continent to its knees and eradicate any vestiges of Western civilization and European heritage.

You don’t need a brilliant idea or plan to win, but you are unlikely to triumph without one.

Any attempts to counter ideas and plans are always doomed to fail unless you have a plan of your own. In the future, if sanity returns to Europe — and it will probably manifest itself in the form of various military coups — the best solution would be to invade parts of the Muslim Middle East and create a protectorate to which illegal immigrants can be repatriated. If failed states in the Third World continue shipping off immigrants in huge numbers to Europe, then Europe certainly has a moral right to intervene and make sure that this insidious practice is stopped once and for all.

We all know it is possible to turn the tide. The only thing that is lacking at the present time is the will and the guts to do so.

 

Some Thoughts on the Dubai Rape Case

Also published at Gates of Vienna

The despicable treatment that the Norwegian rape victim Marte Dalelv was subjected to by the authorities in the UAE — who sentenced her to 16 months in prison for alerting them of her own rape — has by now made its round through the various international news channels. The entire world has gotten a glimpse into the depraved mentality of an Islamic regime that relies heavily on the inhumane Shariah when it metes out punishments to non-Muslims and women, whom it views as second class citizens. However, despite the repulsiveness of the case and all the media coverage that it has generated there is nothing unique about it. Women and non-Muslims have always been treated as inferior citizens in the Islamic world, and this highly unorthodox pardon should by no means be interpreted as a change in policy concerning these matters on the part of the authorities in the UAE.

When people in Norway and the rest of the West rejoice at the release of Ms Dalelv, they should bear in mind that there are thousands of women who are in exactly the same situation, women who are locked away in prisons for being raped or who are living under slave-like conditions where they are mistreated, sexually abused and looked upon as subhumans by their perverted and cruel masters, who draw their moral guidance from the Quran.

The fact that Ms Dalelv has now been pardoned for her ‘crime’ of being raped by the ‘generous’ and ‘benign’ regime in UAE is cause for celebration, however there is no reason to celebrate the Norwegian authorities’ craven handling of this case, which can only be described as abysmal. When the incident was first brought to their attention they chose to keep quiet about it, or to use diplomatic lingo, they decided to rely upon ‘silent diplomacy’ to try and lessen Ms Dalelv’s suffering as a convicted rape victim in a misogynistic and morally corrupt Islamic nation which treats rape victims like dirt. This spectacular tactic adopted by the Norwegian authorities result in absolutely nothing, apart from drawing unwanted media attention to the Norwegian authorities themselves. Instead of informing the media about this incident in order to make as much noise as possible and to create an atmosphere where it would be very hard for the authorities in the UAE to ignore this issue, the Norwegian State Secretary, Espen Barth Eide, chose to sit back and twiddle his thumbs while one of his compatriots was treated in the most appalling manner possible in a nation that completely disregards basic human rights.

It should also be noted that Mr. Eide, skilful diplomat that he is, is fully aware that international condemnation and exposure is a highly effective method of getting through to undemocratic regimes and can exert considerable pressure on them to change their behaviour. Taking this into consideration, it’s fair to ask why he chose not to pursue such an avenue. Why is it that Ms Dalelv, who was raped in March, had to endure four gruelling months of sheer hell, not knowing what would happen to her, when this matter could have been resolved in less than a week — which was the case once the media began to sink their claws into the case? Did Mr Eide completely dismiss such a possibility, or are there other more sinister reasons behind his reluctance to apply such tactics?

There are, of course, a multitude of plausible explanations for this cowardly display by the Norwegian authorities — who are otherwise not afraid to criticize other western nations, such as Greece, when they fail to treat asylum seekers with the same obsequiousness that Norway does. One possible reason is that Norway doesn’t want the rock the boat in a region where Norwegian oil companies are heavily involved. Nor do the Norwegian authorities want to cast Muslims in Norway in a bad light and give ammunition to the critics of Islam and Multiculturalism. It would have been very interesting to be a fly on the wall in the corridors of the Norwegian foreign ministry when the first reports of this case started to appear in the media. The ministry must have been thrust into damage control in order to try and save face, and no one can blame them for a lack of effort in that area.

The Norwegian state secretary, Mr. Espen Barth Eide has frantically attempted to portray the Norwegian government as a pragmatic and result-oriented machine that is able to get things done. Mr. Eide has naturally condemned the treatment that Ms Dalelv was forced to endure in Dubai, but unfortunately for him actions speak louder than words, and the fact is that he chose to remain silent right up until the media got a whiff of the story. He and the Norwegian foreign ministry must hold the regime in the UAE in high regard, considering that they didn’t feel the need to embarrass or bring unwanted attention to the authorities in that particular country with such pesky and insignificant matters as the rape and incarceration of a Norwegian woman.

The fact that this case appeared in the media just before the second anniversary of the 22/7 terror attacks in Norway must have been excruciatingly inconvenient for the authorities, who have used the Breivik incident for all it is worth in order to try and silence anyone who might be harbouring critical thoughts about Islam and Multiculturalism. It’s understandably difficult and extremely complicated to try to condemn and smear so-called “Islamophobes” when the evil actions of the religion that the authorities are trying so desperately to defend are delivering such a devastating blow to the heavily glossed picture of Islam that they, the authorities, are trying to present to the Norwegian people. The fact that it occurred in a supposedly ultra-modern and superficially westernized nation, and not in a backward and Stone Age-like country such as Afghanistan, probably made it even harder for them to swallow.

Another problematic aspect of this case is the way that it has been portrayed in the media in Norway. The sugar-coated state-subsidized version has been very misleading and very biased. The media is, of course, in a position where it can spin a story in any manner it feels like. If it chooses to do so, it can quite easily demonize decent people who stand up for basic human rights and detest human rights violations carried out in the name of Islam, and portray them as vile fascists and racists. It can also, however, extol people who are undeserving of any praise and who should be heavily criticized for their inaction and incompetence, which in this case would be the Norwegian authorities. Unfortunately in this particular case the media has decided to pursue the latter angle, which is not all that surprising considering that the media in Norway on numerous other occasions have deliberately muddied the water in order to serve the interests that are most in tune with their own ideology and that of the Norwegian authorities, especially when it comes to matters concerning Islam and Multiculturalism.

If the media had been doing their job instead of singing the praises of the Norwegian authorities for their ‘brilliant’ effort in bringing Ms Dalelv back home, they would have informed the Norwegian people that the authorities have failed to take any decisive steps to secure justice for Ms Dalelv. The only reason why this case had a happy outcome is due to the international media exposure that has affected Dubai in a very negative way, to put it mildly.

But then again, to be fair to the Norwegian authorities, one has to add that the cowardice that they have exhibited in this case is not all that strange, considering that this is the same government that so gutlessly caved in to Islamic forces during the Motoon crisis, and that even took the unprecedented step of sending Norwegian representatives to Qatar, a country on par with Dubai when it comes to moral corruption, to ask for forgiveness from Yusuf Al Qaradawi, the spiritual advisor of the Muslim Brotherhood, for having allowed a tiny Norwegian newspaper to print a couple of cartoons of the prophet Muhammad.

Back then the Government in Norway grovelled like a perfectly conditioned dhimmi before the very same undemocratic forces that earlier this year sentenced Ms Dalelv to 16 months in prison. Vebjørn Selbekk, the editor who republished the Motoons in Magazinet, was tossed under the bus because the Norwegian authorities were too cowardly to stand up to intimidation by the Muslim world. This time, however, they realised that they had to at least try to pull Ms Dalelv out from under the same bus in order not to lose face completely once the international media spotlight started to shine a little bit too brightly in their direction.

It has been a nauseating experience to behold the craven and spineless behaviour of the Norwegian authorities, who only took it upon themselves to act after massive pressure from the international media made it next to impossible for them not to act and make demands towards the UAE authorities in this matter.

Regrettably this incident is not going to have any bearing on the political direction that multicultural Norway has already staked out. Official Norway will continue to pursue its unrealistic multicultural policies and continue to appease Islam, even though by doing so it is actively promoting Islam and a creating fertile ground for a Dubai-like mentality in the country. Ms Dalelv is now finally able to leave the Islamic hellhole of the UAE, and will soon return home to her native country, but the sad truth is that in her lifetime, provided that drastic steps aren’t taken, she will probably be able to witness firsthand how Norway is slowly transformed into a Dubai-style nation where Islamic laws and customs will gradually gain a more prominent position.

The only way for the authorities in Norway to save face and show that they has some spine is to treat these incidents in the most serious manner and show that they are strong defenders of traditional Western liberal values. This can be done by taking an active stand against Islam, the driving force behind the laws that sentenced Ms Dalelv to 16 months in prison in the UAE, and not by pussyfooting around this issue and constantly turning a blind eye to the actions of the adherents of this vile ideology. The only way to regain a conspicuously missing backbone is to stop grovelling and appeasing a thought and belief system that condones the rape of women, that encourages second-class treatment of non-Muslims, and that rejects freedom of religion and freedom of speech.

It is probably never going to happen, but one is allowed to dream at least once in a while.

 

What is going on inside their heads?

http://gatesofvienna.net/2013/06/gang-rape-in-broad-daylight-in-bergen/

The thing that disgusts me most about the political correct establishment in Norway is the remarkable callousness and mindboggling indifference that they show toward the victims of crimes carried out by individuals whom they have given political asylum and who in most cases are in no need of our protection. Many of these so-called asylum seekers are illiterates with little or no qualifications and with absolutely no intention of contributing to society or to stay on the straight and narrow. Many of them subsequently turn to crime and in many cases very serious crime. The type of criminal activities that these ungrateful degenerates commit to show their gratitude to the nation that took them in housed them and fed them are often very violent and in many cases inflict deep physical and mental scars on its victims. Still this is not enough to prompt the members of the political correct elites to show any moral indignation or outrage for the problems that their failed policies have led to. They don’t shed any tears for the Norwegian women and children that are routinely gang raped, the law-abiding citizens that are mugged and in many cases beaten within an inch of their lives and the countless young Norwegian children that are bullied and physically attacked by gangs of non-ethnic youths for simply being ethnic Norwegians. They have simply chosen to ignore these troublesome incidents and in those rare cases where they are forced to acknowledge that the problem actually exists, they simply sweep it under the rug and try to ignore it as best as they can.

We don’t see any remorse on their part when young women and children get their lives ruined by individuals whom they have welcomed to the country with open arms. We don’t see any remorse when lives are cut short due to minimal impulse control and a complete lack of moral and common decency in those that they so arrogantly refer to as marginalised minorities. We simply don’t hear about any outpouring of moral indignation for the ills that they have brought upon their own nation by actively supporting treasonous policies and by relentlessly pursuing self serving interests. The political establishment do not and will not bat an eyelid no matter how bad the outcome of their policies are, which does raise the question, what are their true motives and  why are they doing this to their own citizens? People who are incapable of showing remorse and empathy are referred to as psychopaths in medical terminology. Psychopathic behaviour is of course frowned upon in the western world so why is it then that such behaviour is so prevalent among the political elites who hold the most important office in the country?

The fact that there isn’t a political will to ensure that women can walk around freely in our biggest cities after dark without having to worry about being assaulted and raped by psychopathic individuals from the third world is very disturbing and it simply doesn’t make sense. Nor does it make any sense that the political elites choose to maintain a corrupt immigration system that sees the arrival of tens of thousands of individuals whose identities cannot be properly verified and whom the authorities know absolutely nothing about. Nor does it make any sense that these individuals are released into society from day one, free to roam the streets of our cities and do whatever they please. It is very hard to come to terms with the fact that the elected representatives of Norway are allowing this to happen and that they continue to follow policies which is fast depleting the nation’s resources and which will ultimately send it over the cliff.

The fact that the political establishment don’t seem to care about the wellbeing of its own citizens is appalling, but what is even more appalling is the fact that the citizens who do care and who do have the decency and moral integrity to voice their concerns are being vilified and demonized by the loyal henchmen of the state, such as the state sponsored media which has clearly forgotten how to do its job, which is to keep an eye on the authorities and hold them to account for their actions. The medias response to any critical arguments are met with accusations of Islamophobia and racism. They’ll use any excuse as long as they don’t have to address the issues at hand, such as the spurious claim that it plays into the hands of right wing extremists who seek to exploit incidents of such nature to stir up racial and religious tensions.

The political elite who are ultimately responsible for this mess will never take a step back and look honestly at the chaos that they have created or to consider whether a change in policy is needed, unlike other normal people who pause, reflect and re-evaluate their options all the time. Doing so would of course mean having to question the wisdom of slavishly following undemocratic recommendations of non-elected international organizations and to ask whether it is in the best interest of the nation to go on importing individuals who have no inclination or prospects of contributing financially to Norway and whose presence there constitutes a serious threat to the future survival of the nations indigenous population.

Individuals who question the wisdom of transforming a once peaceful and prosperous nation into a very unsafe and violent nation, to set it on a course of financial and demographic ruin and established it as a safe haven for illegal immigrants from all corners of the world are not evil right-wing extremists but caring and concerned citizens who have the best interest of their country and their fellow compatriots at heart. It is not those who question and oppose the political correct establishment that have altered the nation beyond recognition. They are not the evil ones. The evil ones are the people that have decided to ignore the clear legal obligation which has been made mandatory for every single Norwegian politician and official representative of the state as set forth in the Norwegian constitution, and instead decided to serve foreign and non-Norwegian interests. Any politician that takes his/her orders from abroad to the detriment of his own nation is a traitor, or to use a more fitting Norwegian term, a Quisling. There are many Quislings’ in Norway at the moment and many of them are unfortunately members of the Norwegian Parliament. Hopefully they can be stopped before they are able to inflict even more irreparable damage to the country that they are so hell-bent on destroying, and hopefully history will remember them for exactly what they are.

Some thoughts on Islamic ‘extremism’ vs. standard Islamic doctrine

One of the biggest fall outs of the intellectual decay and moral cowardness that has afflicted the western world in modern times is the increasing number of intellectuals who are no longer willing to speak truthfully on an ever expanding number of issues for a variety of very disquieting reasons. When it comes to issues dealing with religion, or more specifically Islam, many of these intellectuals will do their utmost to try and convince the general population that those who carry out Islamic acts of aggression and terror in the west are simply misinterpreting their religion and that they are merely extremists bringing their faith into disrepute. In fact this need to constantly exonerate an ideology which is almost alone in producing terrorists today has become such a common occurrence that one can almost describe it as a systematic pattern, just as A comes before B and night follows day, the excuses follow every single act of Islamic terror. In fact it has gone so far that people in the west are expecting to be presented with such feeble excuses in the aftermath of Islamic barbarity.

The latest such grovelling exculpation was offered by the British Prime Minister David Cameron and the mayor of London, Boris Johnson who both maintained that the latest Islamic terrorist act in the UK had nothing to do with Islam, despite the fact that the two Muslims perpetrators who hacked to death the off-duty British soldier while chanting Allahu Akbar and then preceded to justify their deeds in front of a camera by referring to the Koran and perceived western aggression in Islamic countries. An appropriate question to ask after having had to witness such exceptional example of cognitive dissonance from the two esteemed British politicians would have to be; what exactly is the true nature of the religion of Islam? What exactly is the difference between the ideology of the so called extremists and the majority of the ostensibly peaceful Muslims? One would assume that individuals who are making such statements, especially those who appear in the media on a regular basis, is at least qualified to speak on these issues and that they have the necessary data to back up their claims. One would also assume that they have an extensive knowledge of the religion itself and of the ideology of those that they prefer to label as extremists.

Those who maintain that there is a distinct ideological difference between the extremists and ordinary Muslims should really be pushed hard on this issue and not simply have their remarks taken at face value by gullible journalists who have no intention of pursuing the issue in an honest manner, which sadly is the case today. Nor should the questions merely deal with the difference in behaviour, but rather about the difference in religious ideology and doctrine. What exactly is it that the extremists are misinterpreting in order to justify their gruesome deeds and are these perceived misinterpretations, according to these esteemed intellectuals, completely at odds with standard Islamic doctrine? Anyone who has bothered to pick up a copy of the Koran and actually read it from start to finish knows that it is an aggressive and immensely hostile book. It is also a book that has numerous hateful verses that deals specifically with the killing and subjugation of non-Muslims. This is a fact that cannot be contested or somehow simply swept under the rug. Appropriate questions to ask are as follow;

Are these hate filled verses deliberately being toned down by mainstream Muslims and scholars as insignificant or perhaps even discredited as relics from a completely different time and era where different values and norms were in vogue? Are the mainstream Islamic nations distancing themselves from these verses?  Is the Muslim world rejecting these verses or are they in fact acting upon them and doing their utmost to emulate them?

These questions have to be answered in order to get an idea of what is considered mainstream and acceptable today in the Islamic world. Are there movements in the Islamic world that are vehemently opposed to the more aggressive passages of the Koran and that are proposing that these should be removed altogether, or are such movements pretty much nonexistent?

Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders made a short movie, Fitna, in 2008 which he posted online. In it he highlighted the hate filled Koranic verses that Islamic terrorists all over the world use to justify their attacks, and which they use to fuel their hatred for non-Muslims. In it Wilders has juxtaposed footage of Muslims carrying out terrorist attacks in Europe and the USA and the relevant verses from the Koran. Towards the end of the film Mr. Wilders encourages the Muslim world to purge the Koran of these evil verses and cast aside its hostility towards non-Muslims and take the plunge into the modern age. One can hear, but not see a page being torn from a book, in this case a telephone directory, upon which Mr. Wilders informs the viewers that it is not up to him, but the Islamic world to carry out the necessary reformation of Islam.

A fatwa, or a death sentence was issued for Geert Wilders by the senior leadership of Al Qaeda for having produced the movie. The movie received widespread condemnation from both Islamic and Western countries and numerous Islamic organisations and individual Muslims in the west who wanted to see Wilders severely punished for having offended Islam. Attempts were even made to boycott the Netherlands and Geert Wilders was subsequently refused entry into the UK to attend a screening of the movie on the spurious grounds that his presences in the UK would infuriate the Muslim community. The hostile response to the release of movie, which in reality is nothing but an suggestion to the Muslim world to reform their religion and rid itself of Islamic doctrine that encourages hatred towards non-Muslims, is a powerful reminder of the Islamic world’s view on these matters, such as their view on the overall message of the Koran and their unwillingness to reform Islam and bring the religion into the modern era. The desire to carry out this process is simply not there, which subsequently means that western liberal apologists who keep insisting that Islamic terrorist who commits atrocities in the name of Islam have nothing to do with the religion have a monumental credibility problem. If ordinary Muslims are unwilling to disregard or ignore these verses that teach them to hate non-Muslims then there is simply no evidence whatsoever to suggest that the Islamic terrorist who keep attacking and killing in the name of Islam are extremists who are merely misinterpreting or bringing the religion of Islam into disrepute. They are in fact true representatives of the religion.

It is true however that only a small minority of the Muslim community in Europe carry out such attacks, but that’s not really a convincing argument to rely upon as irrefutable evidence that the great majority of Muslims reject such acts or consequently don’t believe that such acts are mandated by the Koran. Studies carried out in Britain have shown that a large portion of the UK Muslim community support Islamic terrorism and would welcome the introduction of Sharia. It is also worth mentioning in this context a study carried out in the USA which concluded that out of 100 randomly selected Mosques in the country only 19 sold literature and other material that didn’t encourage or condone terrorism and violent behaviour, that is of course apart from the Koran itself which actively encourages both. The study also concluded that the mosques which sold such violent material were also very vocal about their support for terrorism and the funding of terrorism. There are also numerous of examples of Mosques all around Europe that claim to be moderate and embrace western values, but which upon closer examination, through undercover reporting with hidden cameras, have been exposed to be anything but moderate. The most famous case was documented in the British TV documentary ‘Undercover Mosque’, but there are also similar examples from many other countries in Europe.

Still the most accurate way of identifying Islam’s views on these issues is to look at the Islamic world itself and examine the values and morals that it promotes. When we do so we find that many Islamic nations are run in strict accordance with the Koran and traditional Islamic doctrine and that the Koran is relied upon heavily in both legal and criminal proceedings. It also goes without saying that it is strictly forbidden to mock or question the teachings of the founder of the religion, Muhammad, in these countries. We also find that in areas of conflict and war where Muslims are involved, most noticeable in the Muslim world, the more devout practitioners are carrying out acts that are very similar to those that we in the west label terrorist attacks. As a matter of fact since 9/11 - 2001 more than 20 000 Islamic terrorist attacks have occurred throughout the world.

When examining the evidence out there that are available to us, such as Muslim’s reluctance to reform their own religion, their reactions to anyone who even hint about such actions, the way Muslim majority countries are being run, the way they react whenever someone offended their religion and the way non-Muslims are being treated in these countries, it is not unreasonable to conclude that Islamic terrorists are not misinterpreting the Koran, nor are they misrepresenting their religion whenever they are carrying out terrorists attacks. They are in fact following their religion to the letter. This is a fact that needs to be relentlessly pointed out in the west and we need to do away with the standard mantra coming from liberal western intellectuals whenever Islamic terrorist attacks occur. The first step towards defeating Islamic terrorism is to realize that it is in fact Islamic terrorism and not simply terrorist acts incorrectly attributed to Islam.

 

 

 

 

A new chapter in Islam’s long running war of intimidation and terror in Europe

The grotesque murder of an unarmed lone British soldier in London yesterday, where two Muslim males first ran over the unexpecting victim with their car in order to incapacitate him, then got out and proceeded to stab and chop him to death with meat cleavers like he was some kind of rabid animal, and supposedly attempting to decapitate him, marks a new chapter in Islam’s long running war of intimidation and terror in Europe in modern times. Such vicious and barbaric tactics have of course been commonplace on other continents for a long time now; hence it is not a major change in strategy by members of the religion of peace, they have just imported one more of their barbaric tactics to Europe and upped the pace in their violent struggle to create a worldwide Islamic Caliphate. The beheading of Buddhist monks in Thailand, the massacring of Christian worshippers in Nigeria and the killing of Christian Copts in Egypt is of course old news for those who have ventured beyond the world of the political correct MSM that for some reason find it enormously inconvenient to present news that portray their favourite European based victim group in a less than flattering light. This time however the MSM had no choice but to describe how die-hard Muslims go about it when they decide to deal with their enemies and it will most definitely not be the last time that they attack in such a gruesome manner in Europe. I’m afraid that this is just the beginning and that the mostly leftwing media is in for one hell of a surprise.

There have of course been other Islamic terrorist attacks in Europe in recent times. Members of the religion of peace even struck in the same city in 2005 when four fellow devout Muslims detonated powerful bombs on the London Public Transportation network killing 52 civilians and maiming countless others, and although that was a truly horrific act of terror I would still venture that this latest attack was more gruesome in nature. The act of hunting down an unarmed, unexpecting and random individual, and then literally slaughtering the poor soul like a rabid dog leaves a far more profound and lasting mental impression on members of the public than powerful bomb explosions instantly killing whoever is unfortunate enough to be in the vicinity when they go off. The fact that the victim was alive when they started working on him, probably fully aware that he was going to be chopped to pieces with meat cleavers and quite possibly decapitated, the pain that he must have felt is a mental image that would make even the strongest of stomachs turn. This is of course something that the terrorist and their sympathisers are fully aware of and which they seek to exploit to the fullest, and the really bone chilling aspect of it all is that their deranged actions can be justified with reference to Koranic verses and various hadiths, a fact that the political correct MSM and the liberal elites seem unwilling to acknowledge.

But it’s not just terrorist attacks that have helped to instil fear and terror in the hearts of the indigenous populations of Europe. There have also been numerous of intimidations campaigns in the last few decades in which Muslims have attempted to silence those who don’t show enough deference to this deranged political vestige from the Stone Ages. This has been achieved by either threatening to use violence or in more severe cases threaten to kill critics of Islam, and there have been no shortage of Muslims who have been willing to carry out these threats, which have made them highly successful. Most people think twice before they speak out publicly if a couple of wrong words could land you in a world of trouble. This was proven once and for all when Dutch film maker Theo Van Gogh was killed in Amsterdam in 2004 by a devout Dutch/Moroccan Muslim for supposedly having insulted the 1.5 billion Muslims of the world. The latest London attack is in many ways reminiscent of this incident. The difference being that Theo Van Gogh was targeted specifically for his part in producing the Islam critical movie ‘Submission’. Theo Van Gogh also knew that he was making himself a target when he decided to start working on this film and he had the opportunity to take the appropriate precautions. Yesterday’s victim however had no reason to expect that he would be targeted and killed by violent Muslims. He was not chosen because he had made insults against Islam; he was simply chosen for being a soldier in the British army.

The fact that Muslims in Europe are now willing to attempt to decapitate randomly selected members of the public  and videotape the atrocity  in order to instil terror into the minds of the rest of population is a dramatic shift in a new direction. However, it shouldn’t come as a surprise as this is a tactic that they have employed frequently outside Europe, in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq just to mention a few examples. I actually mentioned this possibility in an online exchange with an acquaintance a few months ago. I suggested that there would probably come a time in the not so distant future when jihadis’ would kidnap randomly selected people in Europe, decapitate them and publish videos clips of the events online for propaganda purposes as they have done previously in other parts of the world. Individuals who are familiar with Islam and the mindset of its practitioners, and who are not mentally paralysed by political correctness, know that this is an inevitable natural progression of things.

From an Islamic terrorist perspective Woolwich style attacks make a lot of sense. It eliminates the need to acquire difficult to obtain items such as explosives and firearms, it doesn’t require a lot of planning and time consuming preparations and it is almost impossible for the authorities to stop it, just like it is next to impossible for the authorities to stop ordinary murders. The added bonus is that it generates more fear than a major terrorist attack which requires a lot of luck to pull off for the terrorist and a lot of bad luck for the victims to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. Anyone however could be randomly targeted in a Woolwich style attack and the terrorists don’t need a lot of luck to carry them out. Another worrying factor which should make the authorities shiver in their pants is the fact that more and more devout young male Muslims return home from stints in war torn countries with combat experience to match and with no qualms about attacking innocent civilians. Odds are that many of these returning jihadis’ have participated in acts that are just as horrific and despicable, or even worse than the latest London attack. There are hundreds of online video clips of Jihadis’ carrying out the most gruesome atrocities in Syria and elsewhere. It’s naive to believe that these returning warriors haven’t participated in episodes of such nature.

Another worrying aspect is that the authorities in Europe are completely unprepared for this kind of warfare. One question that automatically pops up when pondering this issue is whether the authorities are willing to introduce new tough measures to combat this menace, or if they are simply going to continue to let political considerations take priority over practical manners to effectively deal with this very serious threat. If this latest terrorist attack should become a trend among the more devout Muslims in Europe it will be very hard for the authorities to stop them, and particularly if the authorities refuse to look at the problem in an honest manner. The latest riots in Sweden has shown the world once and for all that the authorities have no control over the mess that they themselves have created and that the problems can’t simply be resolved by means of political correct strategies. The million dollar question is, if this becomes the new reality, how long are the people of Europe willing to accept that they run the risk of being slaughtered by Muslim fanatics every time they venture outside the front door? Fear has always been the terrorists’ strongest weapon and a handful of horrific killings every now and then are more than sufficient to instil an ample amount of fear in the populations.

Unfortunately the silent majority still don’t seem to realize the gravity of the current political predicament that we’re in. They are unable to see that their relative peaceful and calm societies could swiftly be plunged into chaos and anarchy if things are allowed to continue. Many are also incapable of grasping that the authorities in most western nations have already lost control of their societies. They should realize that if things really start to go downhill in Europe and the politicians refuse to take the necessary steps to deal with it members from the various military branches could quite possibly decide to take control and proceed to deal with the problems as they see fit. It’s not unrealistic to expect that military coups could take place within the next decade or so, not necessarily in every country, but at least in some. That’s how it has been in the past in times of turmoil and instability and that’s probably also what it’s going to be like in the future. I sincerely hope that this isn’t the path we’re doomed to take, but with the way things are going at the moment it seem like the most likely scenario.

A short message

I have decided to create a new blog where I will be publishing video clips and other multimedia content. For those who want to check it out here’s the link:

http://thepixelsite.blogspot.com

I will continue to update this blog at regular intervals, but I won’t be publishing/republishing any multimedia material here.

T.O.

Update on removed translated article

Norway Keeps a Lid on the Truth

 

Posted on May 2, 2013 by Baron Bodissey

 

Last night we published a translation by The Observer of an article from Rights.no about the violence and intimidation experienced every day by young native Norwegians in the culturally enriched Groruddalen district in Oslo.

Between then and now — in less than twenty-four hours — Rights.no was pressured by the original publisher to take the article down.

Fjordman sends this brief account of what happened today in Norway.

 

Norway Keeps a Lid on the Truth

by Fjordman

Rights.no says that they were ordered by Finansavisen to remove the text of the Groruddalen story (in English here), despite having originally received a permission to post it. They published a follow-up entry, stating that they had received an enormous popular response to the previous article that was nearly unheard of by the standards of tiny Norway.

It spread like wildfire via alternative media on the Internet, including Twitter and many thousands of references on Facebook.

 

Norway faces national parliamentary elections this fall, and the left-wing coalition government is now trailing in the polls. Most of the political elites and the mass media do not want to talk about the problems mentioned in the article, especially not in an election year. People might get the wrong — or rather the right — ideas.

Human Rights Service, which republished this article online from the paper edition of business newspaper Finansavisen, is an excellent organization. However, they are vulnerable to political pressure because they receive public funding. Attempts have been made by left-wingers to slash their funding, but the right-wing Progress Party (Fremskrittspartiet) has lobbied to protect the state support for them.
I believe they did lose some of their funding by the left-wing government after Breivik, since they were branded “Islamophobes” who had spread “hatred,” but I’ve heard that some of this was later restored. I’m not familiar with all the details.

Of course, the many Muslim and left-wing “anti-racist” organizations hardly ever have their state funding questioned. Only the very rare organizations that criticize Multiculturalism, such as HRS, ever experience these kinds of threats.

 

The problems the article described — the harassment and violence directed at the natives in their own capital city — are very real, and rarely talked about as explicitly as in the Finansavisen piece. Many influential people want to keep a lid on any open and honest discussion of these problems, which are caused by the immigration policies promoted by the establishment mass media and the ruling political elites.