Also published at Gates of Vienna
One of the first things
that comes to mind when observing current events in Europe today — and
especially since Angela Merkel and the rest of the top echelon of the EU
decided to go all out and demolish the already leaking floodgates that were
originally put in place to keep Europe safe from aggressive third world
Lebensraum jihad — is this: how far is a leader allowed to go in destroying his
or her country before someone finally steps in and says “Enough is enough”? Are
there any limits as to what they can and cannot do?
Judging by the mass
insanity that seems to have gripped the continent and the daily destruction and
irreparable damage caused to nations and societies that date back several
thousands years the answer has to be a resounding NO! There are no limits, only
the leader’s imagination or the lack thereof determines the degree of
destruction and treason that he or she is allowed to inflict upon their
nations.
Because we have to be
honest and call things by their proper names, and what is going on in Europe at
the moment can only be referred to as cold hard treason. There is no
other way to describe it and still expect to be taken seriously by any rational
individual. If you do a quick Google search of the “The legal definition of
treason” you get this:
“The betrayal of one’s own
country by waging war against it or by consciously or purposely acting to aid
its enemies”.
As the above example shows,
the term “treason” isn’t difficult to explain, nor is it hard to put into
words. One doesn’t have to be a lawyer or well-versed in the legal jargon of
the judicial system to understand its significance. It is very straightforward,
and it can be condensed down into a sentence of merely twenty-one words, which
of course means that no individual can justify their treason by maintaining
that they didn’t fully comprehend the legal definition of their crime.
Any action that is carried
out purposely and which will cause damage to or severely weaken a nation’s
ability to maintain its national security must be considered treasonous, that
is if it is carried out and condoned by one of its own citizens. The motivation
behind the actions that leads to such an outcome is completely irrelevant. It
doesn’t matter whether it was done for humanitarian purposes, whether it was done
in the belief that it would somehow benefit the nation in the long run or
whether it was simply done out of sheer incompetence and ignorance. The only
thing that matters is the end result. The only thing that matters is the
treason itself.
It’s hard not to draw
parallels between the current situation in Europe and what has happened to
Zimbabwe under the leadership of African dictator Robert Mugabe. When Mr.
Mugabe assumed office in the late 1970s the African nation was one of the
wealthiest country on the continent. Now, more than thirty-five years later, it
is one of the poorest. Zimbabwe has been on a steady decline towards rock
bottom, due to political incompetence, sheer stupidity and an insatiable hatred
of traditional Western values. One can of course describe Zimbabwe’s
transformation by slightly tweaking Norwegian anthropologist Thomas Hylland
Erikson’s infamous quote about white majority nations in Europe:
“Zimbabwe has successfully
deconstructed its white majority business sector, and done it so properly that
it can never be called a majority again.”
No one can accuse Mugabe of
not having deconstructed Zimbabwe and not having done so in a spectacular
fashion. The only problem is that it plunged the country into hyperinflation
and severe poverty in the process. The changes took place according to the
book, and probably according to Mugabe’s own wishes, but the policies were a
complete failure which is often the case with radical political visions
proposed by politicians who have big egos but very little common sense.
Angela Merkel and her
cronies in the EU are European versions of Robert Mugabe, and just like the
African dictator they have nothing but contempt for democratic principles and
people who oppose their insane visions for the future. They are dangerous people
with big egos who despise their cultural heritage. They have a treasure chest
filled to the brim with bad political ideas just waiting to be implemented, and
when they are, they will cause tremendous and irreparable damage for their
fellow citizens. Robert Mugabe gained notoriety for evicting white farmers from
their land and by allowing poor uneducated Africans to move in and take their
place. Merkel and several other leaders in the EU are following his example by
incentivising private landlords to evict their less affluent compatriots from
their rented accommodations to free up housing for newly arrived “refugees”
that Merkel so arrogantly, and without any legal backing, took it upon herself
to invite to Europe.
And it didn’t take long for
the disastrous effects of this megalomania to manifest itself. Prosperous
nations such as Sweden, Germany and Austria are already starting to see signs
of rapid deterioration due to the stress associated with allowing thousands of
“refugees” to pour in across its borders every single day.
Private businesses such as
hotels and boarding schools, to name just two, have been converted into
reception centres for “asylum seekers”. Local councils are pushed to their
limits with unrealistic “refugee” quotas that they cannot possibly cope with,
set by authorities who have shown absolutely no inclination whatsoever to
impose effective measures that will stem the flow of human beings who will end
up as permanent strains on future public budgets. Cosy little towns and cities
that are heavily dependent on tourism are inundated with aggressive young males
from the Third World, especially the Middle East, ensuring that businesses that
rely on tourism will take serious financial hits, which again will
substantially affect the local economies of these communities. Crime will
increase and the local residents will start to get despondent and look for
greener pastures elsewhere, as was the case with the people of European
extraction in Zimbabwe when things began to go belly up in that country.
And just like Mugabe,
Merkel and her cronies are contemplating introducing even more stringent
restrictions on those who disagree with them. Politicians in Germany are
advocating using legal action to hurt organizations who oppose Islam, private
companies have stated that they will start firing anyone who might be tempted
to voice unfavourable comments about the policies of Merkel and Company, and
state-subsidized left-wing newspapers are ready to finish the job of kicking
the living crap out of anyone with “deviant political views”, people who in
many cases are already lying on the ground after having being verbally roughed
up by the politically correct goons of the Left. Bad policies are not allowed
to be questioned or ridiculed, and those who transgress will have to face the
music.
And all of this is
happening while Europe is slowly being transformed into a European version of
Zimbabwe. A continent of white banana republics where successful institutions
are being demolished at breakneck speed to facilitate the visions of the
mentally disturbed multiculturalist elites who show no regard for the damage
that their project will cause to millions of Europeans and their descendants.
And hardly anyone in power is taking a step forward and saying, hey this is
insanity and it has to stop. No one is standing up and calling it for what it
is, namely the greatest act of treason that Europe has seen in modern times.
How far is a leader allowed
to go in destroying his or her country before someone finally steps in and says
“Enough is enough”?
Well, in modern-day Western
societies, leaders can do pretty much whatever they like. They can jeopardize
national security, remove national borders, give shelter to terrorists and give
tax dollars to foreign born welfare scroungers. They can go against the wishes
of the people and imprison political dissidents. They can destroy their own
nations and turn them into unrecognizable ruins of what were once great societies.
They can do all this
because today traitors are not imprisoned and dealt with accordingly. Today
traitors are at the head of the tables in the halls and corridors of power and
political influence. Today the traitors are calling the shots. Today the
traitor has taken the place of the patriot. Today the patriot is imprisoned and
the traitor is lauded.
No comments:
Post a Comment