Sunday, September 27, 2015

The European joyride (A brief report from Sweden)

Also published at Gates of Vienna

The tiny little village of Hedekas in Munkedal Municipality, Västra Götaland County, Sweden is one of those little picturesque places that city slickers caught up in the modern day rat race dream about escaping to. It’s the kind of village you’ll see beckoning to you from screen savers on computer monitors in cramped little office cubicles all over the world. It’s one of those spots where time just seems to stand still and the inhabitants couldn’t care less. It’s the kind of place where everybody knows everybody, where you don’t have to lock your doors at night because you know your neighbors would never in a million years think about breaking into your house to steal your property, or heaven forbid, wish to cause you any harm.

There are thousands of villages just like Hedekas all over the Western world. You’ll find them scattered across the countryside in the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, England, Norway, Sweden and anyplace else where Western civilization is still the dominating force. The people who reside in these places might speak with different accents, have different mother tongues, slightly different customs and traditions, but they all share some common morals and values, and they would instantly be able to recognize the similarities if they were visiting an analogous village in a different country or county. If asked, the majority would probably also tell you that they like things just the way they are.

But unfortunately (or fortunately depending on your political point of view), the Kadour family, newly arrived “refugees” from Syria, see it differently. After spending less than a week in Hedekas, they have had enough and made the life-changing decision to return to Germany, the country they said goodbye to when they decided to try their luck in Sweden. Mulham Kadour, the head of the family, has a hard time disguising his disappointment while being interviewed by a local reporter from, which has stayed in touch with the family since they first stepped off the Stena Line passenger ferry in Gothenburg less than a week ago.

The family is back in Gothenburg, standing outside the central train station with all their belongings packed in big duffel and shopping bags, waiting for the next train that will take them back to Germany, when the interview takes place. Mulham tells the journalist that he became frustrated by the size of Hedekas, by the tiny population and the massive forest that surrounds the village and just seems to go on forever. “Where are all the people?” he sighs, admitting that others had warned him that they might end up living way out in the sticks if they moved to Sweden. When the journalist hints that the family could end up in the middle of nowhere even in Germany, Mulham just shrugs his shoulders and replies that a small village in Germany is probably going to be bigger than a small village in Sweden.

It is quite clear after reading the article that the family had their hearts set on being housed in a big city in Sweden and not a one-horse town in the deep dark Swedish forest, miles away from anywhere else.

Some people might find the ingratitude and pettiness of the family shocking and hard to understand, and at first glance, this seems to be warranted. But when considering the fact that the Kadour family are not refugees, but rather economic migrants of the opportunistic kind, things start to make more sense. Because the Kadours did not arrive in Sweden fleeing war and persecution; quite the opposite. They came from Germany, one of the safest countries in the world, in the search of greener pastures. The father, Mulham Kadour, says “he didn’t come to Sweden just to get a residence permit and food on a plate, but to get a fresh start and to create a future for himself and his family.”

It should be obvious to anyone that such a person, an economic migrant ,is going to be an extremely discerning and fussy customer after travelling through half a dozen safe countries to reach his final destination, and hailing from a region where gratitude is considered a negative character trait rather than a healthy one. Here we have a classic example of a person who has taken a huge risk, put his own life and that of his family in the hands of cynical human smugglers who don’t care whether you live or die as long as they get their money. He has spent large sums with the expectation of reaching a generous welfare state in Europe where, so he’s been told, the politicians will say “How high?” whenever he says “Jump”. In all likelihood he has been swallowing the fairy tales that the human smugglers have been feeding him. Why would anyone expect such a person to settle for a tiny little village in the middle of nowhere far away from his compatriots and populated by people who in his culture are despised and viewed as inferior in every sense of the word, not to mention the fact that he has in all likelihood been inculcated with the knowledge that his own culture will eventually supplant and dominate the Western one?

Viewed from that perspective it makes perfect sense that such a migrant would be dissatisfied with the treatment he has received, and would prefer to take up residence in one of the bigger cities, preferably in a culturally enriched neighborhood with a large expat population where he doesn’t have to deal with the “locals”, where he can still cling on to his own backward culture and not have to go through the hassle of learning the local language. In contrast to a real refugee, would have called it quits the second he reached a safe haven and would be overjoyed by the fact that he finally had managed to find sanctuary, been given a roof over his head and food on the table. And that’s the reason why Mulham and individuals like him don’t care for places like Hedekas, and why many of them protest vehemently whenever they are being sent to such places. Those locations are part of the old Sweden, the Sweden that ordinary Swedes trapped in culturally enriched neighborhoods reminisce about and secretly long to live in, and which “refugees” hailing from the Islamic world want no part of whatsoever.

Mulham Kadour and his family are the focus of this article simply because they are your average run-of-the-mill “refugees” (Muslims), and their actions and mentality show us why this so-called “refugee crisis” is nothing but a gigantic scam. This scam has been running for several decades, and has picked up in intensity over the last few years and has moved into overdrive in the last few months. It has become a metaphorical runaway train that is almost impossible to stop using conventional political means. The scam arose as a direct result of timid political decision-making, third-world dysfunctionalism, Islamic expansionism and downright European political cynicism and cowardice.

The vast majority of the “refugees” that are currently hitting our shores in a manner reminiscent of the Allied invasion of Normandy in 1944 have exactly the same motives that Mulham and his family had when they left Germany and headed for Sweden, namely to seek greener pastures and prey on the collective guilty conscience of Europe and its citizens. And one has to conclude that it seems to be working out exceptionally well for them, judging by the response of the MSM, leftwing organizations and some very deluded and sheltered middle/upper-class individuals, the great majority of whom are women.

As a matter of fact people who follow current events in Sweden got another opportunity a few days ago to witness a peculiar case of “refugee ingratitude”, when forty Syrian refugees in the city of Jönköping lamented the horrible fate that had befallen upon them when they discovered that they had to relocate to a different asylum center in Viebäck, a smaller village “in the middle of the forest” to use the exact words of the group’s spokesperson, Mohamad Fadi Kanaan. Unlike the Kadour family, who at least had the decency to just leave Sweden without taking their anger out on the rest of society, this merry band of forty (male?) refugees barricaded themselves inside the building housing the local immigration department and took their protest to the city centre after they were eventually escorted from the premises, in all likelihood by the local police.

This type of behavior, which is not uncommon amongst refugees in Sweden, must be extremely frustrating for the Swedish authorities, because the authorities are very keen on shipping newly arrived “refugees” to tiny places just like Viebäck and Hedekas. Places that are seen as remnants of the old racist and supremacist Sweden, the Sweden of yesterday, the old Sweden that will have to be wiped off the face of the earth in order for a new Sweden to see the light of day. The desire to alter the country forever is so strong that the Swedish Government is even contemplating taking up loans from the European Investment Bank (EIB) to fund the demographic metamorphosis, which can only be compared with an alchemist’s unrealistic attempts of turning grey rock into chunks of gold.

This ecstatic enthusiasm for a demographic and cultural change has unsurprisingly created a flourishing asylum industry, which is the only industry that is truly booming in Sweden these days. The nine largest private corporations involved in housing asylum seekers made an astonishing SKR 330 million ($39 million, €35 million, £26 million) during the first six months of 2015, up almost 100% from the previous year. The inflated prices and the guaranteed revenue source from the public coffers means that there are huge profits to be made, and this has led some unscrupulous landlords to evict ordinary Swedes in order to house newly-arrived refugees, which ultimately means higher rental returns for these industrious and patriotic folks.

Judging by current and past trends, the Swedish authorities seems hell-bent on ensuring that every town and city in Sweden has an asylum center inside its city limits, so that they can take part in the joyful experience of getting to know newly-arrived asylum seekers from the Muslim world, and fully savor the pleasures of having Muslims as their new next-door neighbors. Before the mass invasion of illegal immigrants to Europe started in earnest a few months ago, Sweden had the dubious “honor” that saw the largest influx of “refugees” per capita of any country in Europe for more than 30 years. In the last ten years that influx has been ten times higher than the European average.

And that pace has picked up considerably. Sweden is now receiving surplus population at such a rapid rate that building new asylum centers and housing its residents in existing asylum centers is no longer enough. New buildings take time to complete and empty buildings are hard to come by.

In response, politically correct Swedish brains have been engaging in some serious brainstorming and come up with some clever new ideas that will solve this troublesome conundrum. One of the proposals that has gained some traction, apart from encouraging ordinary families to open up their homes to refugees, is to house asylum seekers in the holiday homes of ordinary Swedes in order to cope with the huge real estate demand. The irony is that many of these holiday homes are situated in idyllic locations, locations that ordinary Swedes flee to for a month or two each year during summer and winter holidays to get away from the cultural enrichment that has been rammed down their throats. Unfortunately, the idea also fails to take into account that some of the newly arrived “refugees” are probably not going to settle for such substandard accommodation, far away from the enriched neighborhoods of cities such as Malmö and Stockholm, and often in the middle of nowhere, surrounded by forests or mountains. Thus it’s of course reasonable to assume that there will be many more stories about unhappy “refugees” who complain about their living arrangements and lament their remote addresses. Some of those ungrateful individuals will surely explore other avenues and see if they can find greener pastures elsewhere, just like Mulham and his family, who decided to leave Sweden and live off the forced generosity of the German taxpayers instead.

And those who do have nothing to worry about, even though they have left half a dozen democratic countries or so in their wake. The authorities in Germany and Sweden are not going to ask them any inconvenient questions about all the safe destinations in which they conveniently forgot to apply for political asylum. Their status as “refugees” will never be questioned and their motives will not be challenged.

In fact the Swedish authorities are so understanding and accommodating that they have even instructed the state-owned railway company SJ to allow “refugees” to travel on their trains anywhere in Sweden without a ticket, which means that Mulham and his family of five can happily board the train in Gothenburg and travel out of Sweden without paying a single krona. And they are not alone: numerous “refugees” have availed themselves of this generous offer, which ordinary Swedes who are struggling financially can only dream about, to make their way to Norway and Finland, where they have applied for political asylum. It has caused quite a diplomatic rift between Finland and Sweden, and it has rightly led Finland to accuse Sweden of aiding human smugglers.

One could of course view the Swedish authorities’ decision to let refugees ride for free on their trains as an act of altruism by the ultra-politically correct Swedish state, but it could also be viewed as a sign of weakness and a leaf taken straight out of the “how to act in the new Dhimmi Sweden book” authored by the Swedish Police Department, who have implemented the dubious policy of retreating whenever they are attacked by thugs and bullies in order to de-escalate a heated situation. One doesn’t have to be an analytical genius to realize that a situation would go from normal to disastrous in the blink of an eye if railway personnel were forced to throw off large groups of ticketless “refugees” who were hell-bent on reaching their destinations no matter what. Easier just to look the other way and let the testosterone-filled powder kegs be on their merry way.

There have been several incidents, similar to those of the Kadour family and the disgruntled Syrians in Jönköping, where “refugees” have downright refused to step off busses that have transported them to their designated asylum centers, because these facilities have been deemed unsatisfactory (too far away from the nearest city etc.), and the disgruntled “refugees” have then demanded to be taken to another more suitable location.

These cases have invariably drawn the attention of the media, which of course is inconvenient in a country where such situations are considerably toned down. It is probably also challenging for the personnel at these reception centers to have to confront the angry newcomers and inform them that this is as good as it is going to get. The new “free train travel scheme” for refugees will undoubtedly make it easier and much less conspicuous to move unruly “refugees” from one asylum center to another and let someone else somewhere else deal with the problem. All one has to do now is to transport disgruntled customers to the nearest train station, put them on the first outbound train and the problem is solved, without creating unnecessary headlines in the Swedish MSM.

Although the Swedish authorities probably see this new scheme as a win-win situation that will prevent unnecessary stress and hostilities, it will probably also lead to some unwelcome and highly unintended consequences, given that the housing situation is already dire in Sweden and will soon become desperate. In such a scenario it’s not unrealistic to expect that “refugees” who don’t have anywhere else to go, or who blatantly refuse to accept their designated accommodation, will start using trains as a means of getting away from the elements when winter arrives in earnest in a few months time and simply decide to ride these trains up and down the country on a permanent basis. It is quite common to see this method employed by homeless people in cities such as London and Paris that have extensive underground systems running around the clock. These homeless individuals will simply just get on a train, find a seat and sleep for a couple of hours while being chauffeured between the various stations.

If the situation were to become really precarious — and it probably will, judging by the hellish conditions that we’ve seen in places further south in Europe that have been completely overwhelmed by the tsunami of “refugees — it’s even conceivable that some of the “refugees” will take a more militant approach and decide to occupy shopping malls, hotels, office buildings, railway stations and even break into private homes in order to find shelter from the elements and somewhere to sleep.

And, judging by track record of the Swedish police, there probably won’t be anyone to stop them from carrying out their business, at least not if they decide to operate in large groups. The immigrant-saturated Stockholm suburb of Husby saw extensive riots in the summer of 2013, which quickly spread to other parts of the country. Those riots might just be a walk in the park compared to what could happen in the winter of 2015-2016 if things get really out of hand. Unfortunately all the available data at our disposal tends to suggest that it most definitely will.

My advice? Don’t book a weekend getaway in Stockholm or any of the other big Swedish cities this winter. As a matter of fact, don’t book a European holiday at all, because there might be an uninvited guest staying in the hotel room that you paid for when you show up…


Cultural enrichment shock and awe

Cultural enrichment shock and awe

Also published at Gates of Vienna

In the real-time tear-jerking mockumentary which we are being bombarded with these days on Cry-TV and in the Bash-Whitey Media, hundreds of thousands of uninvited illiterate, ungrateful and very hostile illegal immigrants are gate-crashing their way onto the European mainland. It has been described as “a humanitarian catastrophe of epic proportions” by the MSM and the emissaries of impeccable morals, who have bestowed upon themselves the privilege to redefine what is acceptable and what is unacceptable, what words we are allowed to utter, what posts we’re allowed to like on Facebook, which tweets we are allowed to retweet on Twitter, how to express our emotions and when to just shut up and keep quiet.

True, it is a human catastrophe of epic proportions, but not in the way that the humanitarian mini-Goebbels of the West would like to portray it. It’s a humanitarian catastrophe for the indigenous peoples of Europe who have been told repeatedly that they have a moral responsibility to feed, house and accommodate a sea of illegal immigrants, many of whom are directly hostile to them, who most definitely will be unable to look after themselves financially, and who will alter the cultural makeup of the continent until it’s completely unrecognizable.

But this is fine, because this is exactly what the elites in the West want. They see it as a good thing. After all, Multiculturalism is the religion of choice among the morally superior these days. And they get to dictate and pontificate over the whining and racists plebs who are significantly less thrilled about the Third-World tsunami rushing towards them than they are. These members of the elite share the same visions as their co-religionists in the Mohammedan world; the only difference is that while in Islam the practitioners prostrate five times a day, the practitioners of Multiculturalism bend over backwards all day long.

And after a while all this backwards-bending seriously affects their thinking, and they stop seeing the outrageousness of their actions. After wandering around in a multicultural la-la haze for an extended period of time, throwing the doors open wide and inviting people from all corners of the globe to come and take part in the wrecking derby which is the slow and thorough deconstruction of modern day Europe seem like the proper and sensible thing to do. They also believe that slamming and bullying anyone who does not share their views is the apex of human morality.

Rest assured: they do not care that time is running out fast. They do not care that if things do not change dramatically very quickly, the escalating humanitarian catastrophe will most likely morph into civil unrest and full-blown wars with all the nastiness that this entails. Nothing could be further from their minds. All they care about is “our moral obligation”, international conventions, dialogue, harmony, social cohesion and exposing racism and bigotry “for what it is”. Feel-good words are more important than facing reality head-on and exhibiting true leadership. Unfortunately, the silent majority don’t hold them to account, but seem to be quite comfortable with the destruction and misery that the elites are wreaking upon them. It’s a real-life Greek tragedy played out on the political stage on a continent run by madmen.

But what we are seeing today is not a random unavoidable event. It’s a product of a very clever military strategy employed by an emboldened enemy who is high on Western weakness and obsequiousness and hell-bent on conquering our lands and ridding them of anything that they perceive as having corrupt classical liberal ideals. And sadly this is no longer a farfetched pipe dream that will never see the light of day. It is within their reach, and if they succeed they will introduce their religion and philosophy, which is as far removed from liberal ideals as women’s rights are removed from the judicial system in Saudi Arabia. If they succeed, there will not be any opt-out clauses for those who are uncomfortable with a political system that makes the rulers of the Stone Age look like modern-day progressives. It’s all in or out with a bang — or a noose around the neck.

Almost everyone who hasn’t yet gone through the degrading ritual of having to swallow the slow-working euthanasia pill supplied by the elitist heirs to the Western civilization — pills which causes the patient to feel guilt and shame and to despise his own history and culture — see it for what it is: unrelenting demographic warfare. It is even the stated goal of the Islamic State (ISIS), which has promised to inundate Europe with refugees in order to destabilize the continent. Not to mention the Muslim Brotherhood and Al-Qaida, who have written this particular strategy into their master plan for Europe. And also several leaders in the Muslim world who have brazenly and unashamedly boasted about how easy it is going to be to bring the Western world to its knees.

The Germans employed similar tactics during World War Two with their Lebensraum project, but they went about it in a slightly different manner. Unlike the enemy of today, the Germans sent in their military machinery first and then populated the conquered areas after they had been won by force. In contrast, today’s enemies send in their civilian population and their combatants disguised as civilians first, safe in the knowledge that a full victory will follow just as surely as summer is followed by autumn if biology is allowed to run its course. It’s a long-term strategy, generational warfare, if you like. Just as the poor immigrants who arrived on boats from Europe in America in the previous centuries toiled to secure a better future for their offspring, the enemy of today will work hard to establish a fertile environment for a hostile takeover of Europe, and implement a full scale Lebensraum project for their people and a new arena in which to introduce their religious and political ambitions.

There really is no need to delve deeper into the reasons why this travesty has been allowed to take place. The details are well known to anyone who has not undergone the mandatory mental castration which is essential for those who wish to have a career in today’s society. But the effects should be obvious to all, and especially those who have a set of working eyes and a brain that isn’t completely enveloped by the thick mass of multicultural syrup which is being pushed as the truth in today’s uber-humanistic societies.

The reasons why we have reached this epic point of no return are manifold, but mostly they are a result of a relentless political indoctrination campaigns that have permeated every strata of our societies and which have been extraordinarily successful in shaping the minds of the young and gullible — of which there seem to be an overabundance of these days. This process, the equivalent of a nonstop mental gang-rape from cradle to grave, has instilled in the average Western man the notion that he himself is to blame for everything that is wrong with this world, and thus he has a moral responsibility to destroy himself, his own heritage and the future of his offspring, in the name of reconciliation, anti-colonialism, multiculturalism and social cohesion. Those who are unaffected by the propaganda and who speak out are subjected to a more crude form of mental gang-rape, which also involves mocking, bullying, telling untruths and destroying lives, often perpetrated by individuals who lack male genitalia, or, in those cases that they do possess them, have very low levels of testosterone.

They like to brag about the fact that we in the West enjoy freedom of speech, and consequently we are free and live in truly democratic societies, but freedom of speech is a mere illusion if the consequences of using this freedom means that you will lose your job, be completely unsuitable for any potential future employment, lose your house, be hounded by the media, and become the target of violent organizations that won’t hesitate for a second to use force in order to reduce you to silence. That is, of course, if the authorities don’t choose to intervene, by way of prosecuting, bankrupting and shipping troublemakers off to gaol for the heinous crime of telling the truth. It should be obvious to all that employing this same logic, one could also argue that North Korea has freedom of speech; it is just that if you use this freedom there it will be some very unsatisfactory consequences for you.

The unfolding crisis which has picked up steam in the last few months has shown us that the pen is indeed mightier than the sword. It has clearly demonstrated that words and ideas, repeated often enough, with enough fervour, self-righteousness, mockery, intimidation and thinly-veiled threats, can be more potent than the most lethal bullet fired from the most powerful rifle. People these days cower when they are accused of racism, bigotry, hatred, Islamophobia just as much as people a couple of generations ago would cower if they had a gun pointed at their heads. As a matter of fact, the levels of self-preservation these days have reached record lows, to the extent that if someone indeed was to pull a gun at the new, modern, well-groomed Western man, his first inclination would not be to try and run away or overpower his assailant, but rather to try and engage him in a conversation in order to try and understand the underlying root causes that led the poor assailant down the spiralling path of justified victimhood rage.

The enemy we’re facing today has realized that there are two ways to subdue a country and bring it to its knees. One is to overwhelm its armed forces by using superior military might, and the other is to create chaos inside country’s borders by non-military means, which will unleash a chain reaction of responses leading to a crippling of its civilian institutions. It is this last scenario that we are seeing the early stages of today. If you can create anarchy in a foreign country and overwhelm the armed forces and the police, then you have severely weakened that country’s ability to defend its external borders, and thus made it ripe for conquest. It’s a strategy of cultural enrichment shock and awe.

In a way, demographic warfare is synonymous with biological warfare. Even hard-core environmentalists will sometimes refer to the human race as a virus that is slowly destroying our planet by its tendency to multiply at an unprecedented rate, and by devouring all of the Earth’s resources. One could use the same analogy and refer to the “refugees” that keep pouring out on our shores in the same manner. These “refugees” have the same effect on our local ecosystem — namely breeding at an unprecedented rate, devouring a great percentage of our resources and putting the ecosystem out of equilibrium, just as the human race, according to these hard-core environmentalists, are putting the Earth’s ecosystem out of equilibrium.

But maybe we shouldn’t use such an analogy, because the high priests and priestesses of moral justice who decide what is acceptable speech and what isn’t don’t like biology, and they’ll mentally emasculate anyone who dare to use the dreaded word or chooses to elaborate on the consequences of elementary biology. People who spell out the basic facts, as presented in Charles Darwin’s book “The origin of species” are vehemently attacked and given cute little labels such as Nazi, racist, bigot, hater etc. which is often enough to stymie a meaningful debate along those lines. But the proponents of mass immigration are themselves unwittingly relying on biological arguments to justify the rapid descent into the abyss, by referring to the aging population, the declining number of babies being born and the effect that this will have on the population in the long term unless it is replenished from the rich baby fields of the Third World. I suppose facts are a good thing as long as they can be used to prop up self-serving arguments.

The enemies of the West have already won a decisive victory, not a full-fledged one in the conventional sense of the word, but an important ideological victory, in which they have managed to get large groups of the population to sympathizes with them and their cause. It’s like a massive outbreak of battered wife syndrome, in which people have turned a blind eye to the unpleasantness that follow in the wake of mandatory cultural enrichment, and refuse to face the dire realities that lie in wait in the exciting land of the future. The verbal and ideological assault have left us shell-shocked. We are walking around aimlessly scratching our heads trying to figure it all out while bathing in the multicultural euphoria spewed out by the mass media.

If Hitler had possessed the knowledge that our enemies possess today, and if he had chosen to use the same tactics he would probably have had his thousand-year Reich a couple of generations after his death. Today there are thousands of Hitler clones walking around in silly little potato sacks in the Arab and Muslim world who are actively availing themselves of this demographic bomb strategy. These clones reminisce about the good old days of Hitler and they envy his quick and industrial extermination of the Jews. But at the same time they realize that a rapid holocaust “Hitler-style” is probably out of their reach at the present stage, and instead they settle for a slow holocaust, in which the wheel of time slowly grind away at the native populations of the West, and eventually the victims themselves lose hope and give up the will to procreate and the desire to defend themselves.

Strategy is Alpha and Omega in any planned operation. People who don’t have a strategy are just walking around aimlessly in the dark, and will soon be defeated by those who have thought out their moves in advance. The EU’s pathetic non-existent attempts at solving this problem can be viewed as nothing other than an open invitation to the enemy to bring the continent to its knees and eradicate any vestiges of Western civilization and European heritage.

You don’t need a brilliant idea or plan to win, but you are unlikely to triumph without one.

Any attempts to counter ideas and plans are always doomed to fail unless you have a plan of your own. In the future, if sanity returns to Europe — and it will probably manifest itself in the form of various military coups — the best solution would be to invade parts of the Muslim Middle East and create a protectorate to which illegal immigrants can be repatriated. If failed states in the Third World continue shipping off immigrants in huge numbers to Europe, then Europe certainly has a moral right to intervene and make sure that this insidious practice is stopped once and for all.

We all know it is possible to turn the tide. The only thing that is lacking at the present time is the will and the guts to do so.