It’s not really worth writing too much about yesterday’s anti-Islamic rally in Oslo organized by the NDL and SIOE. As predicted, the event only attracted around 40-50 individuals, most of them members of the two organizations. The rally could just as easily have been held at the headquarters of the NDL as a “members only” event.
Rune Hauge,
the leader of the NDL, was correct when he stated in an interview earlier this
year that Norwegians who are critical of Islam need to get up off the couch and
become more actively involved in the fight against this evil ideology. It’s no
good limiting oneself to writing indignant post and comments on the Internet.
Sure, writing on the web has an impact, but at some point people need to get
off their bums and actually start doing some constructive organizational work
and make their voices heard, and demonstrating in a public area is a good
start.
If ten
thousand people had showed up at the event in Oslo on Saturday, and at similar
events across the country in the future, the authorities and the MSM wouldn’t
be able to simply brush them off any longer as ‘radical loons’ without public
support. I’m pretty confident that there are hundreds of thousands of Norwegians
who share the concerns of the NDL and SIOE, but they are reluctant to demonstrate
and take part in these types of rallies. The threat of violence will
always hang over such events as an invisible glove, and, yes, it could have
negative repercussions for some people’s careers, but that’s just the way it
is.
How do
people expect to stop the spread of Islam in Norway in the future if they’re
not even willing to stand up to this undemocratic ideology today? Norwegian
politicians are most definitely not going to stop it; they are the ones who got
us in this mess in the first place by opening the doors for it. Unfortunately,
the responsibility for halting the tidal wave of Islam falls upon the people
who oppose it. It is as simple as that, and subsequently those people who at a
great personal cost are willing to stand up as an example for others to follow
should be commended and praised. They certainly shouldn’t be ridiculed and
mocked, especially not by other Norwegians who are equally critical of this
ideology, but who limit themselves in venting their frustration about Islam
online.
I had a look
at Document.no yesterday and I was saddened to see the editor of the website,
Hans Rustad, belittling and lecturing those who dare to stick their necks out
and stand up for something they believe in. These are principles that should be
applauded, not derided. It is especially sad because Document.no is one of the
biggest Islam-critical websites in Norway, and people listen to Hans Rustad.
I’ve
translated some of Rustad’s poisonous remarks below:
"When reading and
watching NRK’s reports on the Norwegian Defense League and Stop The
Islamisation of Europe, one is almost overcome by a claustrophobic anxiety. It
is difficult to distinguish between NRK’s political grip and the activists’
simplicity. It takes two to tango."
"But the activists are
playing the cards that they have been dealt as effectively as possible. To
demonstrate in a public area, and one where there is a large immigrant
population, is a hopeless undertaking. In theory, NDL leader Rune Hauge’s idea
to show that Grønland is also part of Norway has some validity. But one cannot
ignore the consequences: that it is going to provoke the residents of the area
and that opposing forces will mobilize. And among those opposing forces are
people who feel that they have every right to resort to violence."
"If the activists are
serious about their commitment then they have to listen to the wishes of the people.
People don’t accept confrontations provided that there is a specific issue that
is of such importance that one simply can’t keep quiet about it. The fact that
people failed to support them on Saturday in Grønland does not mean people
don’t take these issues seriously. You don’t get people involved by scaring
them away."
I would
venture that Islam definitely qualifies as a ‘specific issue’ that has to be
opposed in the most rigorous manner even if that includes the likelihood of
getting physically attacked, because rest assured the rise of Islam in Norway
will eventually result in violence and brutality, and it will be directed at
those who are too cowardly to oppose it today, and their offspring. There’s no
need to try to sugar-coat the inevitable.
Perhaps it
would be a better idea, if Document.no and Hans Rustad are so concerned about
the NDL/SIOE’s lack of oral skills and inadequacies in presenting views on
national TV, to encourage people with those skills to join these organizations
and not drive people away from them.
On previous
occasions Hans Rustad has condescendingly described members of the EDL as
unemployed hooligan thugs who are only interested in fighting and drinking. Is
that also how he sees the people of the NDL and SIOE?
Are they not
educated enough for him?
It would be
even better if Rustad and the milieu around Document.no started organizing
similar rallies across Oslo — and the rest of the country for that matter — on
their own terms of course, and began getting the masses more involved in this
fight. It’s no good criticising and belittling those who actually have taken
the leap and who are willing to give it a go. Demonizing and ridiculing those
who have the guts to stand up to Islam only proves that one is a useful idiot
for the radical Left, who must be rubbing their hands in joy when they see the
biggest Islam-critical website in Norway fronting their views in this
particular matter.
Hans Rustad is a Jewish chauvinist - Not a Norwegian patriot
ReplyDeleteWhen a ban on religious infant penis mutilation was being discussed in Norway, Rustad produced two artilcles in which he zealously defended the barbaric practice. Many of his supporters on his website for a change did not agree with him:
Rustad again aired his Jewish ethnocentricism and supremacist illusions in two articles where he defends the Jewish custom of penis mutilation of infant boys. In the article Rustad shows his disdain of Norwegian culture, especially its pre Christian Nordic culture. Rustad maintains that the Norwegians and their culture are greatly indebted to the Jews. Sources:
Document.no 8 august 2012 - Oppbrudd (h t t p://www.document.no/2012/08/red-oppbrudd/) Document.no 5 august 2012 - Seglet (h t t p://www.document.no/2012/08/seglet/)
Rustad presents himself as an advocate for free speech, and has been invited by Free Speech organizations in that capacity, but the truth is a little different; he opposes free speech about historical topics that matter to Jews:
Introducing itself, his website "document.no" writes that "freedom is the basic value on which all other freedoms are built, a freedom which is now threatened, because the tolerant don't want to see that they tolerate intolerance."
But Hans Rustad is not really a supporter of freedom of speech: 'I am not for allowing people to say that they want to kill people, so I think freedom of speech has limits. For example holocaust-denial is a threat against living people today." Source: Klassekampen 6 maj 2006 (h t t p://www.klassekampen.no/36145/mod_article/item)
When fanatical Zionists such as Zvi Mazel, Manfred Gerstenfeld and Efraim Zuroff (Wiesenthal Center) produced yet another book of hate, accusing most of the Norwegian people of being "anti-Semites", Rustad backed up his Zionist buddies.
(h t t p://www.document.no/2008/12/jodefiendtlighet_i_norevekker/)
Well I hope this adds to the understanding of the character of Mr. Hans Rustad.