(I wrote this essay about a month before the Oslo attacks)
I’m now going to make a very dystopian prediction about the future of Europe. I do so with a heavy heart because I don’t want to see Europe, the place where I was born and raised cast into darkness and desperation. As with any prediction there are no guarantees and I would be the first one to admit that things might not necessarily progress according to my scenario, after all I’m not sitting in front of a crystal ball with a direct line of vision into the future. I will also admit that I would have found the scenario I’m about to present highly unlikely only ten years ago if someone had suggested it to me. But what I do have is trends and lessons from the past to help me make an educated guess about what lies ahead, and in the last decade things have deteriorated at such a rapid pace that the likelihood of what I’m about to present has not only started to look like a very real option, but it has started to look like the only option.
My prediction is that Europe is beyond salvation. It no longer matters what steps the various nations in Europe take to avert a catastrophe. Europe can no longer avoid the pending cataclysm brought about as a result of unrestricted immigration from the third world, and in particularly the Muslim world. I believe that armed conflicts and social unrest in Europe are now an unavoidable reality and that the continent will yet again, like it has so many other times up through history, be thrust into the grips of violence and warfare. This plunge into the abyss is a direct consequence of failed political decisions made by the political establishment in Europe, whom have dictated the destruction of secure and stable societies in order to replace them with some illusive multicultural nirvana.
I do not predict such a scenario because I wish for it to happen, nor because I wish to see loss of human lives on a grand scale, I sincerely wish that things had looked more promising for Europe, but unfortunately they don’t. The wheels that will lead the continent down this dystopian path have already been set in motion and those wheels can no longer be slowed down. I’m not going to try and predict who will prevail in the end and what life will be like when peace finally returns, but limit myself to try and pinpoint what I believe are the main factors that have led us to this disastrous situation and what will eventually bring an end to normality in Europe.
My argument is that the uncontrolled flow of denizens from backward thinking cultures has passed the critical stage, and that it is now simply too late to try to rectify the damage that this demographic redistribution has caused. Nor does it matter if there is an immediate and absolute cessation of the uncontrolled movement of illegal individuals from the third world. There are simply too many individuals with different and opposing cultural backgrounds residing in Europe today and the tension this is causing will lead to conflicts. I don’t know when the first signs of violent cultural turmoil are going to appear, but I do know that they will.
To those who find this scenario unrealistic and too unbearable to fathom, I say take a look at the facts and ask yourselves what happens to societies where rapid and violent changes occur within a very short time. What transformations take place in societies where the native populations are replaced by immigrants with completely opposite views and values? What happens to societies when things are turned upside down? What happens when everything that used to be the norm suddenly becomes evil and immoral, and what happens when the political establishment starts to dictate to the people instead of listening to them? The answer to those questions is that people start to feel discontent and this discontent eventually manifests itself in a revolt of some kind. It’s human nature at its most basic level. People do not like to be pushed around and told what to do by a tyrannical minority.
Let’s take a look at it from another angle and substitute the pending European scenario with a slightly different one. Ask yourselves what would happen to a society if food started to become scarce? What if food became a precious commodity and there simply wasn’t enough to go around? What changes would take place in such a society? Would the inhabitants continue to feel solidarity with each other and try to share the limited resources as best as they could? In some societies that would probably be the case, at least in the short run. But it’s not unrealistic to assume that over time when hunger and fatigue started to set in for real that major changes would start to occur. Over time it’s highly likely that strict hierarchical structures based upon brute force would establish themselves and start wielding its power, and that the upper echelons would consist of a dominant and opportunistic minority dedicated to controlling the resources and use these in a manner that would further enhance their grip over the rest of the society. In other words a total breakdown of democratic principles.
Similar undemocratic societies can be found in prisons where the will to survive overrides any instilled moral values about egalitarianism and respect for others. It can also be found in any criminal organization where the show of force and intimidation not only becomes imperative but essential for the leadership to remain in power. It can also be found in many of the countries in the third world where the non-western immigrants settling in Europe originates from. And that piece of knowledge should help explains why so many of them act and behave the way they do. The reality is that in societies where law and order are absent it is those who’re willing to step on others and violate others rights that are the once who are most likely to prosper, and more importantly survive.
In Europe’s case however it’s not going to be a matter of dwindling food supplies that will send the continent into a downward spiral, but rather a gradual deterioration of personal safety and personal freedoms. It is almost certain that Europe in the future will start to resemble some of the more savage societies found in the third world. Even today we can see clear evidence that certain areas of the continent has started to move in such a direction. I don’t think anyone in their right mind can argue that Europe has become safer and more secure in the last couple of decades. There has been an increase in areas where the ambiance of lawlessness has been allowed to take root and where even the police are reluctant to venture in. In that regard Europe has started to resemble the US of the past, where high crime rates where spiralling out of control in many of the inner city neighbourhoods.
In a bizarre twist of fate Europe has started to bear a resemblance to those exact neighbourhoods that the political establishment in Europe ridiculed their cousins in US for only a couple of decades ago. Another confirmation of the deterioration of societal standards in Europe in recent times can be witnessed through the increasing exodus of highly qualified native Europeans who seek greener pastures in the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Many of these emigrants explain the reasons for relocating with rising crime levels and failed multiculturalism. A more compelling argument is hard to find.
If non-western immigration had been more modest and if it hadn’t been allowed to reach the current astronomical levels, and if there had been a strong political opposition with enough clout to deal properly with the immigrants and their steady stream of demands things might have panned out differently. But in Europe today there are no real alternatives to the present pro immigration policies of the left. As a matter of fact there is a massive unified political block supporting and actively encouraging the current demographic makeover. In today's supposedly democratic Europe anti immigration proponents get persecuted and political parties with anti-immigration inclinations get ridiculed and marginalised. People in Europe who do not share the political establishment’s enthusiasm for the multicultural dream are of no importance to the political elites. Their future prospects look very bleak indeed, and unfortunately they are not going to improve. And to make matters even worse the political establishment are getting more brazen about their intensions for the new Europe. They no longer hide the fact that they don’t care about the people anymore. The political establishment display their displeasure for the proletariat quite openly and for some within the elites this type of behaviour is the source of immense social status. But what they don’t seem to grasp is that this arrogant and highly undemocratic behaviour breeds hatred and discontent, and that it will eventually rise to the surface.
The changes that Europe has gone through in the last three to four decades have been too monumental for things to remain the way they are. Two conflicting and totally opposite cultures are facing each other, and the fact that one is extremely aggressive and assertive is a recipe for disaster. Today we see an escalating influx of immigrants into Europe from the Muslim world, and we are able to observe the aggressive behaviour of this culture and the inability, or perhaps the lack of willpower from the political establishment to deal with it in a concise and firm manner. If the political establishment in Europe had been capable of exhibiting at least a minuscule amount of honesty they would have openly acknowledged that a very undemocratic and violent ideology is present in every single European country today, and that this ideology wages a war of intimidation against those who don’t share its views.
There is of course also a second undemocratic ideology present, and it consists mainly of native Europeans, but in many ways it is just as dangerous as Islam. That ideology is socialism and it is represented by the far left. In ideological doctrine Islam and socialism are miles apart, but for some reason they seem to have joined forces and chosen a common enemy, and that enemy is the native populations of the west. Both groups display predatory behaviour in which they act in large groups pouncing on lone prey or smaller groups unable to defend themselves as a way to instil fear and submission. The target of the radical left is anyone with dissenting views and people who don’t endorse their radical political ideology, for the Muslims it is non-Muslims and those who don’t show enough deference and submission for their religion. This has created an atmosphere in Europe where people with different political and religious views no longer feel that they can express themselves freely and openly without running the risk of getting physically attacked, and as a consequence many people choose to remain silent because it is deemed the easiest option.
So how does the average person in Europe who is disillusioned with the way things are progressing deal with their frustration? A more legitimate question would be to ask how the human psyche deals with dramatic and traumatic changes over an extended period. How much trauma is sufficient to push a person over the edge, and when does it exhibit itself in the form of violence? It is logical to assume that a person who has been the target of unprovoked violence/harassment, has seen his family and friends get targeted by violent gangs would become severely affected by these experiences. And especially if these attacks continue for a long time and the law enforcement agencies are incapable of stopping them. How long can this continue before something starts to snap inside the victim and start manifesting itself in retaliatory violence, or at least the wish to inflict violence on his tormentors? And this desire is not simply limited to the victims. It’s also becomes a desire for those who are not personally affected, but who are forced to read about such attacks and witness the consequences of them. What happens when the realization that justice is nowhere to be found finally starts to sinks in? Isn’t it natural to assume that when people’s sense of justice get’s violated and the establishments’ response is simply to shrug their shoulders the road to direct action becomes shorter?
And what type of crimes are we talking about? In present day Europe one of the worst types of crimes occurring is the premeditated sexual assaults of young native women. These cowardly and disgusting acts are on the rise in every country and the perpetrators are for the overwhelming part non-westerners (Muslims). In several of these episodes there is even more than one perpetrator. In the western world the idea that several grown men would get together for the sole purpose of sexually assaulting young girls is so nauseating and disturbing that it’s almost beyond words. Every time these types of cases are reported in the media there is a massive display of hatred aimed at the rapists among ordinary people through the MSM, and not to mention on various internet forums. It’s fair to say that such cases have a profound effect on the psyche of the native populations and that as a consequence the general sentiment towards non-western immigrants (Muslims) takes a plunge. It is impossible in any society for these appalling types of crimes to go unpunished indefinitely. Over time faced with an increase in such horrific crimes certain individuals among the native people of Europe will resort to extrajudicial methods to achieve justice and as a means to vent their anger and frustration over a political system that on the whole is hostile towards them and shows an unwillingness to look after their best interests. The targets of these vengeance attacks might not necessarily be the actual perpetrators; they could also include individuals with the same ethnical backgrounds as the perpetrators, and elected politicians who have paved the way for these types of crimes.
Individuals who commit rape and other forms of violence directed at women and children have a very low standing in the western world. Petty crimes can to a certain extent be tolerated, but with rape it’s different. These sexual assaults are not only mere rapes; they’re acts of war which has the intention of limiting the free movement of native European women. Muslim rapists are with their disgusting behaviour able to curtail one of the most basic liberties that we have, namely the right to move around freely. One would expect that the response from the MSM and the political establishment would be one of moral outrage, but this is not the case. They seem to be more concerned that native Europeans don’t stigmatize the ethnic and religious group that produce the vast majority of these rapists. This constant attempt at excusing the undesirable behaviour of non-western immigrants only fuels the hatred for the establishment and steer more people towards an anti-immigration stance. No political party that display such willingness to appease, and doesn’t do everything in its power to stop these types of crimes will enjoy the support of the people in the long run, and at one stage retaliatory attacks will start to occur.
But it’s not only rapes that are on the rise in Europe. Crimes in general are on the rise and the non-western immigrants are disproportionally represented in most of these cases. When considering the ineptitude of the law enforcement agencies to curb this crime and when realizing that it’s only going to get worse we soon understand that we have a very volatile situation at hand. When people no longer feel safe in their own houses and their own neighbourhoods, when their loved ones gets attacked and the state doesn’t seem to care people will eventually start to re-evaluate their moral codes and loyalties. In the past Europeans have been loyal to the state in return for protection and social services, but in the future when these services can no longer be provided by the state, this loyalty will be redirected towards family, friends and the local community. When people realize that the social contract between the state and the inhabitants has been broken, something that is starting to become more apparent, people will begin to look after their own interests. In an environment where the state is unable to enforce the law, people tend to make up their own rules. I’m not claiming that everybody will start to take the law in their own hands, but there will certainly not be a shortage of people who will choose to do so. And it only takes a dedicated minority to make a profound impact on a society. That is something that Islam has showed us in the west in recent decades.
So how are things going to progress in Europe? In the past the answer to the increase of non-western immigrants into society has been white flight. It has been the easiest choice. People have chosen to take the easy way out and relocate to safer areas where the majority of their neighbours come from similar cultural backgrounds, where crime levels are lower and they feel more at home. And as long as there are sufficient areas to escape to this is going to continue, provided everything else remains the same and no major events disrupts the uneasy atmosphere that exists at the moment. It’s easier to move away than to face the unpleasant and make a stand. This development has left us with what has been dubbed parallel societies, one society where the immigrants crowd together and live according to their values and traditions, and another one where the native populations live according to their values. But what will happen when these two societies eventually collide? What will happen when white flight is no longer an option? This scenario will become a reality in Europe within the next decade or two with current immigration and fertility trends. How are the native populations going to escape from unpleasant problems such as rising crime levels and a radical regression in societal standards? What will happen when there are no more places left to escape to, when one has to finally stand up and fight for ones values? Emigration will be a solution for some, but not for the vast majority who will have to remain behind and deal with the problems.
Some political commentators feel that the people in Europe are so brainwashed and conditioned politically that there won’t be any armed conflicts. They seem to think that Europeans will somehow just lie down and surrender. I don’t think this is the case. In fact I think it’s a very naive and ignorant position to hold. The will to stand up and fight is not based on ethnicity, but rather on moral values and environmental factors. And moral values can change quickly in societies where the rule of law takes a backseat. Whenever people feel backed up against the wall the survival instinct tend to kick in. I believe that the only reason that law and order has prevailed in Europe for as long as it has under the current political system is that life for the great majority have been relatively pleasant. When life becomes harder so will the people. Even the people of Tibet started to show some resistance when they finally realized that the Chinese immigration wasn’t going to stop and that this immigration would lead to the extinction of their culture. When the people of Europe reach the same conclusions they will start to resist too. If the financial crisis continues this process will without a doubt speed up dramatically. I believe that radical change is more likely to take place when people’s notion of a secure existence starts to disappear and is replaced with uncertainty and despair. When violence can strike anyone at any time the truth tends to hit home and people start to adapt to the new situation. When people have no other place to run to they will eventually have to stand up and fight.
The problem with Europe is that up until recently people have clung to the idea that law and order will prevail, and that the problems pertaining to the new multicultural Europe will sort themselves out eventually. It’s not an uncommon reaction to exhibit when problems start to surface. People hope that the problems will go away. The majority in Europe haven’t dared to, or have simply been too brainwashed by the official propaganda to think about what will happen if the multicultural project fails, and a great number of those who have been able to foresee it have chosen not to act because they have understood the risks involved in sticking their necks out. Being linked with anti-immigration organizations and perhaps even being in the public eye as a rightwing sympathizer does have severe implications in Europe today. Anyone who chooses to do so could lose their job and as a consequence risk losing their home and these are serious consequences for the average person. They also risk being hounded and ridiculed by the media, being physically attacked by the far left and radical Muslims and ultimately risk being hauled in front of a judge for propagating hate speech, or face some other preposterous type of criminal charges. Most law abiding citizens choose not to do anything because they understand that the odds they’re up against are too high. And in the back of their minds there might even be some doubts as to whether they’re being too paranoid about it all. It is only when people start to feel that they have nothing left to lose that they will start to act, and that time is fast approaching for Europe’s part.
When the conflicts begin there are going to be many different factions represented. The political establishments will in my opinion continue to control the armed forces which will ensure the continuation of power. In my opinion they will also come down hard on anyone who they feel are a threat to their position. There will also be left against right, as well as groups defined by cultural backgrounds. When the two dominant cultures eventually do clash there will be violent attacks on immigrants committed by Europeans. There will also be attacks on members of the political establishment, one shouldn’t underestimate the displeasure many Europeans feel for the political establishment who have actively worked to facilitate the current situation.
And what will be the defining event that launches the unrest? What will tip people over the edge? I don’t think that there is going to be a specific event that will unleash the pending Ragnarok. The various terrorist attacks against the west in NYC, London, Bali and Madrid didn’t have that effect. I believe that the steady accumulation of repressed rage caused by crimes, and in particular cases involving rape of young native girls committed by non-western immigrants and Islam’s ever increasing demands and calls for restrictions on our freedoms will cause this unrest. It will start on a small scale and then it will escalate. There are those who still cling to the hope that stricter immigration laws will stem the flow of immigrants and that this will lead to a type of assimilation and a more peaceful outcome, but I believe that it will only slow down the process, it will not avert it. The problems can’t be resolved through ordinary political processes and in my opinion they can’t be solved peacefully. The current political madness has simply been allowed to go on for too long.
The rate of non-western youngsters disassociating themselves from our way of life and liberal western values are rapidly accelerating and this is very concerning as percentagewise there are more juvenile immigrants than adult ones. And even if it was somehow possible to stage some type of mass intervention and bring people back on our side it would be an impossible task to achieve as the numbers of radicalised youths are too great and there simply wouldn’t be enough qualified people in the west to undertake such a formidable task. And for every soul saved twenty new ones would take its place. It would be like slaying a dragon only to discover that new heads keep popping up every time it is beheaded. Could Europe have assimilated these immigrants if Islam had been taken out of the equation? Perhaps if the number of new arrivals had been more modest and provided that they had shown a greater effort at fitting in and contributing. There are very few people in Europe that don’t tolerate immigrants solely based on skin colour. The main cause of their disapproval is related to culture and the unwillingness of the immigrants to assimilate and contribute to society. But sadly this is not the case in Europe today. Islam is most definitely part of the equation and that makes it an unattainable goal.
It’s understandable that an alien culture strives to assert itself when it encounters new ones. Every culture has in it a drive to project its values and norms on to others. That’s how cultures survive and thrive. Cultures who do not dare to assert themselves will eventually be absorbed by other more dominant ones. Islam has already created massive tensions in Europe and these tensions will eventually manifest themselves in a violent manner the stronger Islam becomes. Even if a complete moratorium on immigration and family reunification from the Muslim world were to be implemented today, the damage has already been done. The alienation and resentment it has caused has excluded any hopes of a peaceful outcome, and its continual aggressiveness and rapid growth will guarantee a violent response from members of the native populations. But the pending conflict will not only be limited to clashes between European and non-western immigrants, it will also involve clashes between groups on both sides on the political spectrum. Such ideological conflicts have occurred previously in Europe and they will occur again. After all Muslims are not the only group that is trying to destroy our societies; it is also a stated goal of the far left.
Conflicts could also be unleashed by the far left as a response to what it sees as a growth in rightwing popularity, or as a result of strict austerity measures like we’ve seen in Greece as of late. It is also highly likely that the Muslims themselves will start the unrest, either in the form of increased terrorists’ attacks or if welfare benefits ceases or are drastically reduced as a result of the financial crisis, and last but not least if stricter political measures are taken to control the Muslim community or to limit their numbers in Europe. In every country in Europe Muslims rely heavily upon welfare benefits, if these payments slow down or stop altogether a large portion of the Muslim community will find it very hard to survive. We could also see military coups take place in Europe at some stage in the future. Military personnel are for the most part conservative, and would find it easier to resort to violence if they deemed it necessary or political prudent. There could also be scenarios were powerful anti-immigration organizations hire mercenaries to carry out attacks on the immigrant communities/politicians, either as retaliatory attacks or with the aim of creating conflicts.
I do believe that the various national intelligence communities in Europe would be able to prevent some of these attacks, but I do also believe that it would be much harder to stop attacks from native Europeans than it would be to stop attacks from radical Islamists for the simple reason that there are far more Europeans than there are Muslims in Europe today. The intelligence community is also heavily involved in monitoring radical Muslim organizations and therefore it would be harder for Muslims to fly under the radar. Another thing worth keeping in mind is that radical Muslims have always been affiliated with specific mosques and specific Islamic organisations. Native Europeans wouldn’t have to be associated with any organisations or religious groups, and thus make it harder for the authorities to monitor and control them. Internet would also play an important role in intensifying and spreading the conflict. The copycat effect would ensure that similar attacks would occur in other parts of Europe. Native European on a whole also has far superior military training which would be advantageous, nor would they stand out when they move about or carry out surveillance missions. On the down side Muslims wouldn’t hesitate in using suicide bombers and resort to terrorist attacks, which would have devastating consequences.
Many believe that such scenarios will never happen in peaceful and tranquil Europe, but keep in mind that Europe lost more than 50 million people less than 70 years ago. Acts of intolerable cruelty was committed during WW2 on the continent by native soldiers. It just goes to show that whenever change occurs it occurs fast. The notion that Europeans are somehow incapable of carrying out atrocious deeds and randomly attacking people because of their religion and skin colour is naive. The fighting instinct is an ingrained trait in every one of us. If the circumstances dictate it this instinct will kick in, that is something history has taught us.
So let’s quickly sum up the factors that have to be present, either on their own or all of them together before serious unrest is going to occur. In my opinion they are;
It is going to occur in a semi-lawless society in which crime simply becomes too unbearable for the native populations in Europe to handle and they are forced to make a stand.
It is going to occur if the financial uncertainty continues and welfare services and market economies starts to collapse or show signs of collapsing. If native Europeans are no longer guaranteed financially safety unrest will eventually break out.
It is going to occur when the alien culture becomes stronger and in particular when the Muslims start calling more aggressively for the scaling back of traditionally western values.
It is going to occur if there is an increase in terrorist attacks perpetrated by Muslim or an increase in violence perpetrated by the far-left.
It is going to occur when the immigrant population reaches a certain critical level, making it impossible for the native populations to escape to ethnically homogenous enclaves. When people are no longer able to run away from the multicultural nightmare, their only option is to face their problems or surrender.
When people finally reach the stage where they feel that they have nothing left to lose and when the state is no longer able to protect the native population ordinary people will have to take the law in their own hand if they want to achieve justice.
I did write an article about future possible scenarios for Europe a couple of years ago in which several bleak scenarios were discussed and the likelihood of these scenarios occurring. I’m convinced now that a violent scenario is the only option for Europe. People are aware of radical Islamists, but more and more are starting to realize that Islam itself is radical. The sad thing is that they are discovering it too late. Whenever conflicts have occurred in Europe in the past the enemy have for the overwhelming majority been external. Today it’s an internal enemy (the Muslims/left) and therefore the result will be bloodier and any type of conflict will be harder to resolve, external enemies are a lot easier to deal with. If the disagreements had been minor and not constituted such an immense threat to our way of life, and if the Muslims had been less adamant and aggressive in advocating their goals things could have been different, but they aren’t and therefore the downward trajectory can’t be stopped. And as a consequence Europe is racing towards the cliffs.
More and more people are starting to realize that Islam has declared war against our societies through the actions of civilian Muslims and the Muslim religious leadership. More people in Europe are also waking up to the fact that Muslim representatives are actively working on destroying our systems and way of life. More people are starting to realize that our political leaders are actively ignoring the tensions that this behaviour is causing and that the leadership is actively involved in repressing those who dare speak out about it, and more people are starting to realize that there is a very real threat that the native inhabitants of Europe are going to become a minority in Europe if things don’t change. This possibility of a pending genocide, which is very real scenario with the current immigration and fertility trends, has a very sobering effect on the psyche of the native population.
The source that has been most formidable in shedding light on these immense problems is in my opinion the Internet. The free flow of information and ideas on the internet is the antidote to the MSM and it has had a huge impact on the popular opinion on non-western immigration. People have finally started to get their information from alternative sources and are no longer forced to rely on skewed accounts from journalists with a poorly hidden agendas. The newspapers have also been forced to shed light on the problems as a result of the free and accurate information flow from various internet sites. And why not, there’s no point for the MSM to obfuscate the truth whenever immigrants are guilty of perpetrating crimes when hundreds of sites on the internet have accurate information about the ethnicity of the perpetrators. And of course the average person has eyes and ears and they are more than capable of observing what is going on around them. The MSM can’t cover up the truth indefinitely. The Internet has worked as a weapon because it’s free and unrestricted. It is beyond the control of the elites, at least up until this point.
Another thing worth keeping in mind is that if things change for the worse in northern Africa with the introduction of societies based upon Islamic Sharia this will have a rallying effect upon all those who value western civilization in Europe. It will also prove once and for all for those who are still in the dark about Islam that the religion is barbaric and undemocratic, and that it is manifesting itself in a manner that is very foreign to western values. The case that it would be right on Europe’s doorstep would make it even more imperative to impede Islam’s rise to power inside the birthplace of western civilization. Many people who previously prescribed to the multicultural ideology have made a complete U turn and are now strongly opposing it. More will follow. More Muslims are coming to Europe, that’s a bad thing. But on the other hand more Europeans are waking up to the threat that this poses, and that is definitely a good thing. Hopefully Europe will be able to rise up victoriously from the unrest that will surely come and once and for all and purge itself of the mad ideologies and venomous ideas that has brought it to the verge of collapse. The process will take time and it won’t be pretty. Many people will die before victory is secured, but hopefully they won’t have to die in vain.